VI Summer
School in Mind & Language
Siena, June 13-15, 2013 Teacher: Luciano Bazzocchi
Anonymous feedback :
In a range from 1 (min) to 6 (max), average : 4.89
how much has the course been interesting for
you? middle vote: 5 .
In a range from 1 to 6, how much do you think average : 5.44
the course is stimulating for a Wittgenstein’s
scholar? middle vote: 6 .
In a range from 1 to 6, how much do you
think
.
the course is profitable for a student average : 4.56
on philosophy of language? middle
vote: 5 .
In a range from 1 to 6, how much would you .
recommend a similar course for next year, average : 5.33
at
“Very interesting, very
stimulating.
Great philological work”
Signed feedback :
What do you think about the scientific level of
the course?
□ wholly
satisfying 78%
□ satisfying 22%
□ medium .
□ low
level .
What about intelligibility and clearness of the
course?
□ wholly
satisfying 56%
□ satisfying 44%
□ medium .
□ low
level .
What about the discussions and the reception of
questions and remarks?
□ wholly
satisfying 45%
□ satisfying 22%
□ medium 33%
□ low
availability .
What about the topics and the range of the
issues, in relation with your expectations?
□ wholly
satisfying 22%
□ satisfying 67%
□ medium 11%
□ low
range .
“The seminar was very
stimulating.
I think there are other possible
interpretations,
including other aspects of
Wittgenstein’s philosophy,
like his interests on art,
aesthetics, ethics, etc.”
Rubèn Aguilar
(Ludwig-Maximilians Universität – München)
“Highly recommended for a
correct exegetical interpretation
of the structure of the
Tractatus and for consequent debates
regarding the content of many
remarks”
Anna Boncompagni (Roma Tre)
“Non ci sono stati dibattiti accesi.
Forse mancava qualcuno avverso alle tesi esposte”
Sergio Keller (Università di Bologna)
“Congratulations, great job!”
Federico Somaschini
(Università di Pisa)